Skip to main content

Microsoft MCPD Certification Preparation

While I likely won't pursue it (probably not the best use of my time...), I'm starting to point some of my folks down the .Net 2.0 certification route and I wanted to clear up some confusion as well as share some of what I've learned. There are three MS Certified Professional Developer (MCPD) "tracks" one can pursue: windows, web, and enterprise applications (EA). Due to the exam matrix (below), I would recommend developers pursue the EA because it's a combination of web and windows requiring only 5 exams. In contrast, pursuing the web and windows tracks individually requires 7 exams.

Labels:

Comments

Jeff Hunsaker said…
Additional helpful thoughts/advice from my colleague Michael B.

The first four PRO exams are thoroughly covered by msdn, various websites, google and the sample certification exams on MeasureUp and Self Test Software. If you have completed a Web and Windows project, they shouldn't really be an issue. Something to remember about these exams is that they cover issues you might not always use. For example, the Web exam covers mobile webs quite extensively (.browser files, control adapters, etc.) The Windows exam loves to ask you about printing forms (I hate doing custom printing).

As I have found out, the hard way, the final PRO exam is a bit different. There aren't any training resources readily available. MSDN and Microsoft have nothing... The specification was pretty vague...

These final exams cover a lot of architecture, planning, and testing type questions. This is the one where you differentiate yourself from a developer and a principal consultant or architect.

The best advice I have received was to read the P&P book cover to cover and to learn how to use Team Foundation Server. It takes a while to get to the point where even reading about the P&P is feasible. However, don't be scared off by it. It is an awesome book and your knowledge of building Enterprise Applications will grow exponentially. I didn't really look into Team Foundation Server too much, and it killed me. A lot of the testing (bugs, security, load, etc.) questions are all based on using TFS effectively.

...
...
...


It would be very beneficial to set a goal of passing the MCTS exams for Windows and Web first. There are only two exams to prove you can handle anything thrown at you by either platform. The next exam is the Distributed Applications certification. This will show your proficiency at creating Enterprise type solutions. Web, Windows, Mobile, Web Services, etc...

At this point, you will be set up to read the P&P book and grow into a more architect based developer. Learning how to assess infrastructure, testing and resource planning will make you a better consultant as well. This also has the added benefit of allowing you to achieve certifications goals without that giant MCPD PRO Enterprise looming over you.
Friday, July 06, 2007 7:59:00 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Hero Write-up: Now this is Customer Service!

My best friend Scott is president/C-everything of a small northeastern Ohio manufacturing concern, KirkKey Interlock . I hadn't spoken with him for a while and wanted to see how Canton fared with the Blizzard of '08 (that's what they're calling it...not me). I say, "So what's new?" He replies that on Tuesday his primary server (which essentially runs the business) came up with lame with not one, but [a statistically improbable] *two* physical disk failures on a RAID5 hardware array. My friend attempts the fix but gives up pretty quickly after seeing some Linux nasty-grams on the boot screen. His service provider is an old college buddy who lives down in Raleigh, Cerient Technologies led by Jason Tower . Scott couldn't email out because Exchange was on the toasted server. Being creative, Scott started Treo-emailing photos of the screen. Unfortunately, Jason couldn't receive email because a storm had knocked out a lot of local hosting. [Sigh] After...
4 comments
Read more

Certified or Certifiable?

As a senior technology professional, I interview a lot of candidates. I also maintain solid relationships with other folks in the community. Frequently, the topic of certifications arises: A good investment? Valuable? A clear measurement of skill? Consensus appears to draw the line related to one's seniority. If you're (for example) just out of school and looking for an instant creditability boost, by all means pursue a certification. Likely, this credential will assist you in overcoming the "junior" tag and likely land you more interviews and client roles. (Note: I'm going to use the terms senior and junior here...no offense to either. Can't think of a better one word description. I was a junior once too.) In stark contrast, the value of certifications drops off the table around the 2-3 year mark. Some in my circles even perceive certifications as a negative for the senior professional. They think, "If this guy is so solid, why is he wasting valuable...
5 comments
Read more

Lab Management in Visual Studio 2010 Released

In my experience, there's a lot of animosity and poor communication between Development and QA . It's not that they don't appreciate one another so much as they never seem to stay on the same page. QA : "What's the status on defect #4874?" Dev: "Done." QA : "Done?" Dev: "Yeah, I fixed that Tuesday." QA : "Err, ok . Well where is it? I mean where can I verify it?" Dev: "No clue. I committed it Tuesday. It passed unit tests and built successfully." QA : "Alright. I'll track it down." Invariably , QA speaks with the build manager (if there is one) to find the build in which that defect was repaired. After discovering the correct build, now QA needs an environment stood up to house that build. But wait, the UAT environment is currently testing the next release. It can't be disturbed for another week. At this point, the QA person's blood pressure heads for unsafe levels and the Dice.com bro...
1 comment
Read more